[sac-forum] Re: List of Latitude and Longitude for SAC observing sites

AJ and Peter;

 

Thank you very much for the information on Lat. and Long. Positions for the
usual sites we travel to.  I may get on the EVAC site and add a few more
that I plan to visit in the future.  All in all, I think I have enough to
extrapolate any that are new and I do have a map of Arizona in the car, I
will see if it has Lat. And Long. On the side of the map, I assume it will
have that available.  

 

I do think that AJ and my new scopes use minutes and seconds, so thanks for
the conversions, Peter.  Also, the scope really only uses the position for
the first setup and alignment stars, after that it has calculated its own
spherical trip functions that apply to the sky from the stars used during
the alignment.  

 

Clear Skies to us all;

Steve Coe

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of AJ Crayon
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:47 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: List of Latitude and Longitude for SAC observing
sites

 

Peter, my GPS uses decimal minutes so they were used.  Guess I could have
changed the decimal minutes to second with a simple multiplication by 60.
I've tried to reset it to used seconds but haven't been successful.

 

Thanks for the update.

 

Clear skies,

aj

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Peter Argenziano <mailto:pargenz@xxxxxxx>  

To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:15 PM

Subject: [sac-forum] Re: List of Latitude and Longitude for SAC observing
sites

 

Oops... forgot one:

 

113 01.900 = 113:01:54

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Peter Argenziano <mailto:pargenz@xxxxxxx>  

To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:11 PM

Subject: [sac-forum] Re: List of Latitude and Longitude for SAC observing
sites

 

AJ,

 

Here's what I have for Hovatter Road (Antenna):  33:35:07 N, 113:37:58 W

 

And the notations in deg/min/sec for those specified as decimal minutes
below:

112:05.147 = 112:05:09

112 53.749 = 112:53:45

113:17.833 = 113:17:50

 

Peter

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: AJ Crayon <mailto:acrayon@xxxxxxx>  

To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 8:36 PM

Subject: [sac-forum] Re: List of Latitude and Longitude for SAC observing
sites

 

Steve, here is my list - 

 

                                       Latitude   Longitude
               Antenna                 33:35:??   113:38:??
               Arizona City            32:27:36   111:43:48
               Cherry Rd #1            34:31:08   112:05:08
               Cherry Rd #2            34:30:869  112:05.147 note decimal
minutes
               Dirt Boulevard          33 15.125  112 53.749 note decimal
minutes.
               Eagle Eye Rd            33:43.775  113:17.833 note decimal
minutes.
               Five Mile Meadow        34:41:57   111:26:50
               Flat Iron               33:39:58   112:49:11
               Gas Line Rd             33:21:51   113:01:44
               Saddle Mountain         33 21.865  113 01.900  note decimal
minutes
               Sentinel                32:49:36   113:12:24

These are the more active sites.  Note that I don't have a good fix on the
Antenna site.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Clear skies,

aj

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Steve Coe <mailto:stevecoe@xxxxxxxxx>  

To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 8:00 PM

Subject: [sac-forum] List of Latitude and Longitude for SAC observing sites

 

Howdy all;

 

I have a new mount, the Orion Sirius, and it demands a Lat-Long position for
its location each time it starts up.  I know that someone posted a listing
of SAC observing sites that gave GPS positions and I may have downloaded it
and it just went to the big hard drive in the sky;-)

 

Anyway, I can't find it and would like to make a printout to take with me
when I go out with the new mount.  So, if someone (or several folks) has
created such a list, would they please post it here so I can capture it.

 

Thanks;

Steve Coe

Other related posts: