[sac-forum] Re: Last Nights' Meeting.....

   Let me be clear on this, the act in question is that no access to the
"high water mark" is to be disturbed in any way. We are very much in the
clear in this regard. We should also get in touch with the owner of the land
to see if he as been informed of the erosion act. The sign in question did
not appear as an "official government sign". I don't think anyone would be
foolish enough to setup a scope on the bank of a wash anyway. At our meeting
with the state inspectors it was indicated that construction of our
infrastructure (fiber optics) would be watched very closely. When I design a
route for the fiber it has to pass review by the inspectors. This keeps them
busy, so I don't think that we pose any threat to the "indigenous life" that
the act is designed to protect. My apology for raising the point, I did not
intend to scare anyone from going out to observe. If we continue to use
common sense then everything will be fine. I will still gather the
information and pass it to the club. Cox is sending us to classes concerning
the act (at $16,000 each). I have not seen anyone busted yet, just the
stories that the instructor has passed on to us. And it is $25,000 a day
until the wash is restored. DON'T PANIC...  We are all very responsible
people and would not dream of causing the death of any thing that the
government wants to protect. ( I know I could go off on them, but I will
refrain).

Clear Skies... and can anyone tell me the site for the Voyager III software?


Andrew.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 9:57 AM
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Last Nights' Meeting.....


> Thad, thanks for the post; especially about the Cherry Road "erosion
control zone."  This topic came up when someone indicated there's a sign on
a post, just before entering the gate, that has words to the effect this is
an erosion control zone and cannot be used.  I remember seeing the post but
not the sign the last time I was there, on September 20th, but didn't notice
the sign.
>
> The gentleman that offered most information and will, I believe, check
into what's going on is Andrew <whose last name escapes me>.  Jennifer spoke
with him and chould have more information.  Apparently Andrew has something
to do with Cox and digging cable trenches.  This puts him in a unique
position to have an idea where to start investigating what is really
happening.  Someone may have to take on this task once he gets back to us.
>
> I think Thad has the correct idea in not posting personal opinions here
but let me just say that I'm very disappointed in, apparently, loosing a
very nice observing site.  Let's wait and see what the research and
investigating turns up first.
>
> Clear skies,
> aj
>
>
> Thad Robosson wrote:
>
> > Hey All,
> >
> > But we also had some concerns pop up at the meeting.  Apparently, some
government entity has declared the Cherry Road site an "erosion control
zone".  It's not clear exactly if this impacts our using the site, but a
member (forgive me, I'm terrible with names.....:-(   ) volunteered to find
out what is up with this.  The suspicion is that the wash on the West side
of the site is the specific target of this.  Either way, until we find out,
the fines can be $25,000.  I'll refrain from saying anything bad about
certain Politico types here, but if you're interested in my opinion of said
Politicos, ask me how I feel about them out of earshot of children!
> >
> >
> > Thad
>
>

Other related posts: