[sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: "David Hofland" <hofland@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:04:13 -0600
David Hofland Director, Student Services College of Nursing and Health Sciences Jacksonville State University 256.782.5276----- Original Message ----- From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxx>
To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 2:31 PM Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Curious
Rick, ditto. AJ Crayon Phoenix, AZ----- Original Message ----- From: <saguaroastro@xxxxxxx>To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Stan Gorodenski" <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 1:27 PM Subject: [sac-forum] Re: CuriousTo my recollection of conversations regarding AL membership & SAC, there just doesn't seem to be enough benefit to members or interest to warrant the expense of membership.Rick ---- Stan Gorodenski <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I just received the Dec issue of Reflector, a publication of the Astronomical League. In it is an article about Jeff Medkeff. I wondered how I got it but then I discovered from the address that it came from The Prescott Astronomy Club because of my membership in the club. It came with a membership directory and so I looked for SAC. I could find the Phoenix Astronomical Society, RTMC, the Desert Foothills Astronomy Club, the Tucson Astronomical League, and the Roswell Astronomy Club where we used to live in 1957-1959. Why is SAC not a member? I seem to recall this may have been discussed some time in the past but do not remember what was said. Stan
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Richard Harshaw
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: saguaroastro
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Curious - Stan Gorodenski
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - saguaroastro
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - gene lucas
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - David Hofland
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tim Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tom Polakis
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Rick Tejera
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tim Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - David Hofland
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Jack Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Rick Tejera
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - David Hofland
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Jack Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Jack Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Chris Hanrahan
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tim Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Rick Tejera
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tim Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Jack Jones