[sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Jack Jones <telescoper@xxxxxxx>
- To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:44:06 -0700
Thanks, I'll pass then. One pin is enough anyway. I'm not one for bling. Jack AJ Crayon wrote:
Jack, for the Herschel 400, aka Herschel I, SAC donates to the AL treasury for this award, which includes the pin and numbered certificate. At this time SAC is not eligible for the Herschel II award because we are not a member.However it appears, from Dicks message, one can get the HII award by being a member at large for the year in which it is submitted. Hummmm, this sounds interesting.AJ Crayon Phoenix, AZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Jones" <telescoper@xxxxxxx> To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:29 PM Subject: [sac-forum] Re: CuriousThanks, I realize that from the discussion, except my question was: would I get the Herschel II award and pin like I got the Herschel award and did the club have to pay for that privilege. AJ?Jack Richard Harshaw wrote:Jack, if you wanted the Herschel II pin (bling) and certificate, you could join the AL as a member-at-large, submit your logs, and get the award. Youonly need to be a member in the year in which you submit your log. Richard Harshaw Cave Creek, AZ -----Original Message-----From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jack Jones Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:11 PM To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [sac-forum] Re: CuriousFor my Herschel 400 award, I received both the numbered Certificate and a lapel pin from the AL. I wonder if that is the case for the Herschel II and if we had to pay a fee with submittal.Jack
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Tom Polakis
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Rick Tejera
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Richard Harshaw
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Tim Jones
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Jack Jones
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Richard Harshaw
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: Jack Jones
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-forum] Re: Curious
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Curious - Stan Gorodenski
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - saguaroastro
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - gene lucas
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - David Hofland
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tim Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tom Polakis
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Rick Tejera
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tim Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - David Hofland
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Jack Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Rick Tejera
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - David Hofland
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Jack Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Jack Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Chris Hanrahan
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - AJ Crayon
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tim Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Rick Tejera
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Tim Jones
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Richard Harshaw
- » [sac-forum] Re: Curious - Jack Jones