[sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- From: Andrew Goodwin <a.goodwin1@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:18:01 -0400
It is enforced by the Army Corps of Engineers who report violations directly
to the Justice department. We need to look at the area first and make a
judgement as to what we can do within the bounds of the law. Simply put, you
are not allowed to divert a wash or water management grade or ditch in any way.
The risk is too great for our club and the members. I will check with our
sources here for how this can be handled to avoid a steep fine.
BTW Right of access will not protect us.
Clear skies
Andrew G.
>
> From: "Stanley A. Gorodenski" <stan_gorodenski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2005/04/04 Mon AM 11:50:05 EDT
> To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
>
> It seems like repeated driving over the rise by a lot of cars going to
> and from the star party might have the same effect as taking a shovel to
> it. Once a bank is rounded off it cannot be restored. It must be the
> depth of the grade that has to be restored by section 404. Maybe it is
> okay by section 404 to cut the bank down and create more of a gradual
> incline as long as the removed dirt is not thrown into the grade(?)
>
> Stan
>
>
> Andrew Goodwin wrote:
>
> > Do not dig or alter the entrance to the observing site.
> > This rise is required to divert run off water from causing erosion of the
> > road and field. This is covered by the clear water act section 404, if you
> > are caught The fine is $25,000 a day until the effected area is restored. I
> > will discuss this at our next meeting.
> >
> >Clear Skies
Andrew Goodwin
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Cherry Site
- » [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- » [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- » [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- » [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- » [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- » [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Site
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski