[sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: "cvsc1" <cvsc1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 01:03:23 -0500
Jack et all;
Lost that e-mail with the drive.
But have taken care of the sentence. It's gone!
I am looking for 1999, march, april, may, june, july, august, september, and
december.
I am also looking for march 2000
Stan Clark
>It was in a separate email to you. It's at the top of the Observing Programs
>page right after "This article discusses all SAC observing programs."
>Delete the next sentence "The only exception is the 1000 New Objects
>program." as it does not apply to the web page.
>
>I can bring all those issues to the meeting. Those were the work of the
>amazing Laurie Larson if anyone remembers her.
>
>Jack
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: Jack Jones
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: Jack Jones