[sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: Paul Dickson <dickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: SAC-Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:25:52 -0700
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:58:54 -0600, Jack Jones wrote:
> The March 2000 article (this was a great issue - I will try to get Stan to
> put it on the website, it seems to be missing) defines the advanced programs
> and they are in the right order here (I'd say the definitive order). On the
> website, they are not. If Stan would be so kind as to get that fixed too?
Perhaps they aren't in the correct order because the newsletter with the
correct order is missing? :-)
-Paul
- References:
- [sac-forum] Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: Jack Jones
- [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: Jack Jones
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- » [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- [sac-forum] Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: Jack Jones
- [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: Jack Jones