[sac-forum] Re: --[AZ-Observing]-- Re: Good Seeing Predicted for Tonight

Jimmy,

Fortunately the camera is easier to use than the model number is to remember: 
DMK 21AU04.  They came out with USB2 last November, and that's when I bought 
it.  Mine is 640x480 pixels.  I think Chris has the 1024x768 model, which 
offers more coverage for subjects like the moon, but has a max frame rate of 30 
frames per second rather than 60.

I have no interest in deep-sky imaging with a Webcam.  If I want to do that, 
I'll get a CCD camera.  I'm sure there are ways to force it to do good long 
exposures.

The RGB filters are expensive.  I bought Astronomik fitlers per the consensus 
on Cloudynights for ~$200.  Then you need a filter wheel, and I'm perfectly 
satisfied with the manual one I bought from Orion for another $200.  Add the 
camera, and the imaging setup costs about $800.  The reasons to spend all that 
more coin over a ToUCam is that the high frame rates are not compressed and 
it's a monocrhome, so you don't lose resolution due to the Bayer matrix.

Tom




---- Jimmy Ray <jimmy_ray@xxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> My first response was "Wow!" which I followed up in my mind with the 
> questions that Gene ask. Now I'm curious as to which model of their 
> monochrome cameras do you have? Have you tried or is the camera capable of 
> any good deep sky results (I'm guessing yes as max shutter is 60 minutes? 
> Bottom line, do you like it? Have you looked at their color cameras? Etc, 
> etc, etc...

Other related posts: