[sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:50:18 -0700
Jennifer, I don't think Steve was trying to change the nominating process
because of his use of the word willing. The concept here is that we would
wait until it was time for the nominations, have out names put in along with
any others willing to run for office, let the membership cast their vote and
accept the results.
One of the other reasons for the early post was to attempt filling the
treasurer's position.
I don't understand how, attempting to find a slate of officers is bypassing
the system, albeit it being early.
In regards to Tom's and your concern about others running for office I don't
see how this is any different than waiting until nomination night when those
interested get put up for voting process. Would this process shut down the
newer members intention of running?
Also, I appreciate your compliments about intentions and appreciate both of
your concerns.
Clear skies,
aj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jennifer Polakis" <m24@xxxxxxx>
To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:33 PM
Subject: [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
AJ,
There are no hard feelings. And I feel you missed my point almost entirely.
Regardless of whether I run for a board position or not, Steve Coe's attempt
at changing the entire nomination process with one quick and easy email is
entirely inappropriate for many reasons and is _not_ in the best interest of
Saguaro Astronomy Club.
And it's not that it "doesn't sit well with me", it's just plain wrong to
bypass a system and our Constitution that has been in place and understood
by the members of our club for the past 30 years on a whim. As a current
board member and an active SAC member I feel a sense of duty to bring this
to light for the future health of our club.
Steve's post will also have the negative effect of other people who may have
been considering an office to just not bother because it appears it is
already a done deal.
Additionally, to an outsider or a new member who doesn't know Steve's
intention, his email can very well be construed as an effort to bring
together a group of like-voting board members to promote some personal
agenda. And NO, I do not feel that is his intention or the intention of the
rest the 2008 board members he has put together--all of whom I consider
capable for the respective positions as they were assigned to them by Steve
Coe.
Jennifer Polakis
Secretary
Jennifer, I'm sorry if Steve's post doesn't sit well with you. Yes it
isn't something that has been done in the past, is quite different and
should indicate there are SAC members willing to serve. Often times, more
often than not, it has been quite difficult for the outgoing board to fill
vacancies, which made me feel satisfactory with the post.
As long as I've been president there has been only one time when more than
one person vied for an officers position. We had a fun time with it.
May I suggest you also run for vice president, enjoy the moment and let
SAC members decide.
Like you, I don't want to cause any hard feelings and hope we can stay on
that thread.
Clear skies and see you at the meeting,
aj
I find this new way of nominations a bit scary, kind of improper, and a
little bit offensive to officers who may be able to keep their positions for
another year.
I was planning to run for VP next year instead of staying on as
secretary for another term.
This "group ticket" approach two months before usual nominations at the
Oct. regular meeting is highly irregular and as a current board member I
would like to state that I neither condone nor invited this email.
I apologize if this makes a rift and I know that it is often difficult
to fill the board positions but any changes to something as important as
nominating the board, should be approved by the current board members and
most probably the membership _before_ being posted on these lists by a
non-board member.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Polakis
Secretary
There is a group of club members who are willing to be officers for
next year:
Matt Luttinen Pres.
Steve Coe Vice Pres.
A.J. Crayon Secretary
David Fredericksen Properties Officer
We need a Treasurer, I know that there is someone able and willing to
do this job, please get with me at the meeting if you would to handle the
club finances next year.
Thanks;
Steve Coe
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] [sac-forum] Re: Re: Re: Club officers for next year
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Club officers for next year
- From: Jennifer Polakis
- [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- From: Jennifer Polakis
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- » [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- » [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- » [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- [sac-board] [sac-forum] Re: Re: Re: Club officers for next year
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Club officers for next year
- From: Jennifer Polakis
- [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-board] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Club officers for next year
- From: Jennifer Polakis