[sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- From: "Rick Tejera" <saguaroastro@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:08 -0700
Ok, Stan just assed the access info to me. I will put it a text file print
it and stash it. I think it should be held by at least two board members.
Most logical would be the President & Secretary (Jenn, you ok with this?).
I think we ought to jump start the incorporation of the club and move our
account info with go Daddy to the organization. Since I won't able to
attend next weeks meeting we can schedule a board meeting for March and
discus it further then
Clear Skies
Rick Tejera
President, Editor SACnews
Saguaro Astronomy Club
Phoenix, Arizona
www.saguaroastro.org
saguaroastro@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of theprof@xxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 12:38 PM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
All,
FYI
I just spoke with Rick and have passed to him all logon info that I have for
the website.
Stan
---- theprof@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > Anyway, 2006 is in the past. You just need to pay for 2007. :-)
>
> Not a problem!
>
> As for the other stuff, I agree that more than one person should be able
to access the account (passwords etcetera).
>
> Stan
>
>
> ---- Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 8:13:09 -0800, Stan Clark <theprof@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Paul et all,
> > > Membership - Yea I guess I slipped up by not being able to attend
> > > meetings due to work scheduling conflicts.
> >
> > I started this thread is only partially due to you not currently being a
> > SAC member. It mostly has to do with you being the only one who
> > absolutely knows the password for the account (Steve's not so sure any
> > more).
> >
> > My feeling, is that SAC as an organization should get its act together
> > regarding the web site. If something were to happen to you and Steve
did
> > not have enough info to reestablish ownership, the club would be in a
> > world of hurt.
> >
> >
> > > As for account settings, the ISP hosting is in Steve Coe's name and
> > > I have not changed password information. So at least two people
> > > already have the ability to access the account. Yet steve is the
> > > only one who can make a phone call and shut it down / change
> > > things. So the real issue is who the ISP will allow to access and
> > > make changes over the phone. Right now a phone call from Steve,
> > > because he holds the account details (credit card etcetera), is the
> > > only way to fix things with the ISP. He alone has the ability to
> > > walk the website away from the club. I could change content on the
> > > site, but am not able to create more damage than a content change.
> >
> > Actually you have all the info necessary to call-in when you access the
> > account. You would be walked through getting that info.
> >
> > If the account were a car, having access to the account would not only
> > mean having the keys, but the title too.
> >
> >
> > > As for who the domain name saguaroastro.org is registered to, that
> > > is a good question. A domain name search shows this information as
> > > private. Perhaps your abilities within Godaddy can provide better
> > > details to the club.
> >
> > What you're referring to is a Whois search. One example is
> > whois.godaddy.com, another dnsstuff.com. Because privacy is being used,
> > there is a second account on domainsbyproxy.com that is holding e-mail
> > for SAC's domain. This can be set to auto-forward if needed.
> >
> >
> > > P.S. I let it slip, but if I had received a reminder about my dues,
> > > I would have sent a check. What will it take $$ to get back in good
> > > standing?
> >
> > There is a line between reminding and harassing. I set it at one
> > reminder last year (Feb 22) and you replied four days later that you
were
> > sending a check that day. I brought the subject up with Rick at least
> > one time (maybe several) but I don't know whether he sent you a reminder
> > or not.
> >
> > Anyway, 2006 is in the past. You just need to pay for 2007. :-)
> >
> > -Paul
> >
> >
>
>
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- From: theprof
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- » [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- [sac-board] Re: Worrying about SAC's Website
- From: theprof