[sac-board] Re: Waivers

Rick,

Rick you are right that was the July Issue. What there a previous 
issue that had the original amendment? The information in the August 
Newsletter is very different from the "new" in blue information of 
the July issue. I see the amendment still says a member will be 
expelled for not signing a waiver. Exactly what is being proposed is 
confusing at best. Have things changed since the August Newsletter?

Jeff

At 22:24 -0700 9/8/05, Rick Tejera wrote:
>Jeff,
>If you are going to cite passages, please be accurate. The article you cited
>was published in the July issue. It was the original proposal and changes
>made to that point. Since then the change has evolved to the point that the
>specific paragraphs you cite are no longer included in the proposal that
>will be voted upon. Please see the ACTUAL August Issue for the precise
>wording. This essentially shows your argument that all members will be
>required to sign a waiver as a condition of membership is patently false.

>Rick Tejera
>Editor SACnews
>Saguaro Astronomy Club
>Phoenix, Arizona
>saguaroastro@xxxxxxx
>www.saguaroastro.org

-- 
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html

                     Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
                       7812 West Clayton Drive
                   Phoenix, Arizona 85033-2439 U.S.A.
                                www.hposoft.com

Other related posts: