[sac-board] Re: Waiver wire
- From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:48:59 -0700
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:26:33 -0700, Peter Argenziano wrote:
> In all of the emails over the past few days, I seem to have lost track of
> the central issue presently at hand. I'll summarize for myself (and
> possibly for others). Directors, please correct me if I misinterpret what I
> read.
Almost entirely correct.
> Currently the membership is being asked to consider three amendments to the
> SAC constitution:
>
> 1.) Article III - 3 introduces the concept of using liability waivers for
> any specific event, and grants the directors the power to request use of
> such a waiver at any specific event. Such a decision is subject to
> ratification by a vote of the members.
Membership can veto the use of a waiver if it so chooses.
> 2.) Article VI - 1 - 5 states that a member may be expelled from the club
> for attending an event that requires a signed waiver and refusing to sign a
> waiver for that event.
>
> 3.) Article XII defines event participants as those who have signed a
> waiver for an event that requires a signed waiver.
>
> So really, all the talk about the contents of a waiver, and its
> ramifications, are premature. What is being proposed now is whether or not
> SAC should use liability waivers. Do I understand correctly?
-Paul
- References:
- [sac-board] Waiver wire
- From: Peter Argenziano
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Waiver wire
- » [sac-board] Re: Waiver wire
- » [sac-board] Re: Waiver wire
- » [sac-board] Re: Waiver wire
- [sac-board] Waiver wire
- From: Peter Argenziano