[sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:17:10 -0700
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:12:53 -0700, Jeff Hopkins wrote:
> I think you are wrong. You underestimate the club and members.
>
> Ask for volunteers. I think you will be surprised at how many people
> will step up.
Then explain why we once went until January before filling an office.
Nominations start in October.
> Make a board position for a safety person. Make a board position for
> a Membership chairman.
>
> Most organizations are run by a small percentage of the membership.
Not necessary. If someone volunteers and can define their duties, I'm
pretty sure they can be appointed chair of their committee. SAC already
has several standing committees run by members: Newsletter, Public
Activities, Web Site, ATM, Astro-Imaging, Deep-Sky. There are a two
special committees: Waiver, Incorporation, and soon the Nominating
committee (usually the president trying to find someone to take his
place).
I'm sure if they are successful, they can be made board positions. But
remember, board position have two-year limits, committee chairs don't. So
for board positions, a series of members will be needed to perform the
job.
-Paul
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Peter Argenziano
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Frank Martin
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Peter Argenziano
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Frank Martin
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins