[sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins <phxjeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:51:54 -0700
The club is fast approaching a financial crisis any way. I think as a
side issue the club needs to look closely at expenses and income.
What is really important for expenses and how can income be
increased. Raising dues will not be productive as you will lose
members. One key is a membership drive. More members means more money
and the cost per member does not increase, but the income does.
As for the cost of additional insurance, one must weigh the value .vs
cost. I have offered essentially no cost suggestions that really
should be considered (showing the club is safety conscious).
Jeff
At 08:35 -0700 8/26/05, Thad Robosson wrote:
>>
>> At 07:50 -0700 8/26/05, Frank Martin wrote:
>>>I vote that we just take out a liability policy for the offices of the
>>>club
>>>and be done with it. No matter what we do or how we write it someone can
>>>always sue us if they want to.
>>>
>>>Frank
>
>Yes, it does make sense, until you factor in the added expense. There
>was specific concern about losing membership due to the waivers; what
>kind of membership losses will SAC experience if the dues go up a
>significant amount? The increased dues won't give the membership any
>added value. (Unless they gain satisfaction in that the board members are
>protected.)
>
>Unfortunately, there is no ironclad solution to the protection question.
>(Just staying home notwithstanding.)
>
>It is an interesting thread though. I'm pleased that so many are
>participating
>in this discussion, and I look forward to seeing which course the membership
>decides is best.
>
>Thad
--
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
7812 West Clayton Drive
Phoenix, Arizona 85033-2439 U.S.A.
www.hposoft.com
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Paul Dickson
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Peter Argenziano
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Frank Martin
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Thad Robosson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- » [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Peter Argenziano
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Frank Martin
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Star parties & waivers
- From: Thad Robosson