[sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- From: "Peter Argenziano" <pargenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:27:21 -0700
Bigger does not necessarily mean better. I see no value in gaining more
members just for the sake of having more members. SAC has been around for 26
years - so the formula in place must work! I don't see the club being in any
danger of 'dissipating'.
I think if you look at it from an historical perspective you will see that
the club has attained equilibrium with regards to membership.
Peter
- References:
- [sac-board] Some Comments about SAC
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- From: Peter Argenziano
- [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- » [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- [sac-board] Some Comments about SAC
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- From: Peter Argenziano
- [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Some Comments about SAC
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski