[sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- From: Andrew Goodwin <a.goodwin1@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:02:07 -0400
Ok, can we agree that photo maps to observing sites and meetings are a good
idea? Understand that the waypoints will not be on these maps. Perhaps Thad
should demonstrate what he is talking about. I am going to submit maps to Thad
using the AutoCad Map program I use at work. These maps will be much smaller
file size and will not have all the unimportant distracting detail. I will
bring them to the next meeting both printed and on a CD disk.
>
> From: AJ Crayon <acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2005/06/21 Tue PM 09:34:02 EDT
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
>
> If you are looking for a vote from the Board, count me out. But if you
> are looking for opinion and thoughts I don't seem much to having the way
> points, or whatever they're called, on the map or in a file for
> retrieval by any kind of unit. They will have very little use, even by
> owners of GPS units.
>
> Clear skies to all,
> aj
>
>
>
>
>
Andrew Goodwin
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- From: Peter Argenziano
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Site Updates
- From: Peter Argenziano