[sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:23:03 -0700
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:27:42 -0700, Peter Argenziano wrote:
> It looks like everyone has suggested all of the appropriate editorial
> changes. I'd like to add another suggestion, one having more to do with
> layout and readability, as well as user-friendliness. A tri-fold layout is a
> much better format for such informational flyers. In addition to looking
> more professional, they also take up less space at the point of display (and
> that's important when you are asking a retailer to make them available for
> distribution).
>
> If you would like to prepare a tri-fold layout and send me the finished
> product, I'll get them printed in the requested quantity (in color, of
> course). If you'd rather not attempt the imposition necessary for this
> layout ,I'd be happy to do that given the graphic images as separate files.
> Or, if you'd rather not change the layout - that's OK too. I'll still take
> care of the printing.
I'll change the format, but it might take a couple of days.
-Paul
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Paul Dickson
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Tom Polakis
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: gene lucas
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Peter Argenziano
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Tom Polakis
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: gene lucas
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Handout for 2007
- From: Peter Argenziano