[sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:46:02 -0700
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:02:22 -0700, Jeff Hopkins wrote:
> I believe Peter is correct that the members of an organization are
> not liable only the board members. If incorporated, only the
> corporation's assets are at stake.
Not entirely true. IANAL, but in a suite for damages, board members and
their assets can be brought in. It's most likely dependent on what the
suite was about. If board members sanctioned something like a drag race
at the observing site, then I can definitely see this happening. But if
they behave like we normally do, then probably not.
I'm in favor incorporating, and I'm willing to help. I just don't want to
be the one doing all the work to get it done.
-Paul
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Peter Argenziano
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Peter
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Jeff Hopkins
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Peter Argenziano
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Peter
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0
- From: Jeff Hopkins