[sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0

Thad,

I think this Friday's board meeting is already busy enough. Not sure adding 
discussion about
incorporating is feasible. Perhaps next month is a better idea. I liked Paul's 
summarization for
this week and think that will keep it to a normal length. Just my opinion (as 
if I could give
someone else's opinion).

Peter 

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Thad
Robosson
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:18 AM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution and Proposed Amendment 2.0


Ya know, this discussion is starting to sound like a debate of the lessor of 
two evils....
I know that are/were strong opinions against incorporating, but with the 
discussion at hand, it's
starting to sound like it would be more "seamless" 
than having
all members/participants/etc. sign a waiver.  I am curious as to what the 
downside to incorporating
is as opposed to a release form.  If it boils down to "simplicity and ease of 
use", then we may have
to discuss it further to see which one really is the lesser of two evils.

And don't feel like we have to save it all for the board meeting.  Please, 
let's keep this channel
open and working.  It's amazing how much ground we've covered in our spare 
time.  We would have
never gotten this far in a board meeting.

At this point, the board meeting will consist of the few other topics posted, 
as well as Paul's
outline. Unless there is a compelling reason presented on this mailing list, 
the only thing I may
want to add to Paul's outline is if incorporating is a feasable option vs. the 
release form.  I'm
not swayed either way, nor am I pushing either way, I just want to explore the 
options so that we
can decide what the best for the club is.

Also, we can keep the discussion going, and call for an extra board meeting 
next month.
This allows the general membership to give their experiences and opinions, as 
well as gives them a
chance to join in on the meeting itself.

Thoughts?  Ideas?  Rotten tomatoes?

Thad

Other related posts: