[sac-board] Re: Place Whining about Waivers Here
- From: AJ Crayon <acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:45:52 -0700
Paul, I guess your first paragraph is why the confusion when you've got
a lot of messages to catch up. Only 15 messages today, quite
managable. I'm going to answer this one first because it is of the most
important.
My position is there will be a 2006 AAMM regardless of what happens to
incorporation, waivers and amendments. I'll not hold the marathon
hostage. Now, about the next year something is going to have to be done
to cover this, otherwise one has to consider going it alone and having a
waiver regardless of what SAC does. I don't like this as there are too
many unknowns.
Now, having said the above, please, please let's follow Thad's and
others requests to stay on topic. This means, lets not get into a
discussion of what will happen in 2007. Am I abundantly clear on this?
If not best I can suggest is to NOT respond to this message.
Now I'll try to review the prior messages for response.
Thanks,
aj
Paul Dickson wrote:
>Please attach whining about using waivers here. Hiding it among messages
>about the constitution amendment helps no one.
>
>BTW - I believe AJ has stated: No waiver - No marathon.
>
>It's his neck he's putting on the line for the club. And the waiver is a
>small price to pay for having the marathon.
>
> -Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
- References:
- [sac-board] Place Whining about Waivers Here
- From: Paul Dickson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Place Whining about Waivers Here
- » [sac-board] Re: Place Whining about Waivers Here
- » [sac-board] Re: Place Whining about Waivers Here
- [sac-board] Place Whining about Waivers Here
- From: Paul Dickson