[sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- From: "Jones, Jack (AZ75)" <jack.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:33:37 -0700
The file Paul sent was 1.2 MEG. I didn't want to argue a bunch of numbers,
I'm just saying it takes too damn long to load. Nobody answered my question:
Can't we get rid of these special fonts in future issues and use some of the
+100 common fonts that are available? There should be something there that
would be similar and we would like.
Jack
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tejera, Rick [SMTP:rtejera@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 5:47 AM
> To: 'sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
>
> From what I can tell they do thiers on MS Word. I do ours on MS Publisher.
> Publisher is a true Dsktop publishing program. It's not nessecarily the
> fonts but the features in publisher that give it the flexibilty to produce
> a
> professional looking publication. I'm really loathe to going back to a
> word
> processor. Also consider that the last issue was 16 pages vs the 8 or so
> for
> EVAC. The embedded fonts thing added to the file size as well. The file
> size
> for the last issue was 897kb not 1200. Without embedded fonts it would be
> about 400kb. I guess a regular sized issue (12 pages) would be about
> 500-600kb. Based on the response I've gotten so far regarding enmbedding
> fonts it 3-0 in favor, so file size doesn't seem to be an issue with
> people.
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- From: Paul Dickson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- » [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- [sac-board] Re: Newsletter Size
- From: Paul Dickson