[sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Tom Polakis <tpolakis@xxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 22:27:12 -0500
I mentioned "anonymous" because there is just about zero interest in these
files outside of SAC, and an equal chance that anybody would want to harm them
or steal them.
Tom
---- Peter Argenziano <pargenz@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've never seen a web server that didn't allow ftp access, although allowing
> it anonymously would be unusual. All of the sites that I have a hand in, at
> work and play, have their files maintained via ftp. As a side note, my
> personal favorite ftp client app is FileZilla - free (open source),
> full-featured and rock solid.
>
> Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Polakis" <tpolakis@xxxxxxx>
> To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 7:29 PM
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
>
>
> ---- Paul Dickson wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose the following duty for future secretaries:
> >
> > Track and maintain all SAC handouts...
>
>
> Doesn't SAC have an ftp site where the Web site resides? It seems like it
> would be easy for the author of a handout to send it to this site by
> anonymous ftp rather than putting it in the hands of a central point of
> contact.
>
> If she wishes, I will let Jennifer comment on the concept of balancing
> tasks by loading up the Secretary with more tasks.
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Peter Argenziano
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Peter Argenziano