[sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: "Stars" <stars@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 20:23:44 -0700
My hosting service provides anonymous ftp login, for a directory that is
separate from the web site. That way people can up load and down load files
that are stored in this directory. I will check into it more as I have
never used it, but possibly could make it available for the club use.
Thomas Hilton
SAC member
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Peter Argenziano
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 8:02 PM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
I've never seen a web server that didn't allow ftp access, although allowing
it anonymously would be unusual. All of the sites that I have a hand in, at
work and play, have their files maintained via ftp. As a side note, my
personal favorite ftp client app is FileZilla - free (open source),
full-featured and rock solid.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Polakis" <tpolakis@xxxxxxx>
To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 7:29 PM
Subject: [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
---- Paul Dickson wrote:
> I would like to propose the following duty for future secretaries:
>
> Track and maintain all SAC handouts...
Doesn't SAC have an ftp site where the Web site resides? It seems like it
would be easy for the author of a handout to send it to this site by
anonymous ftp rather than putting it in the hands of a central point of
contact.
If she wishes, I will let Jennifer comment on the concept of balancing
tasks by loading up the Secretary with more tasks.
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Peter Argenziano
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Peter Argenziano