[sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 23:30:14 -0700
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:07:38 -0700, Rick Tejera wrote:
> First thing would be to define "Official". From MPOV, that means anything
> that has some "legal" connotation. To that end the only thing I can think of
> would the Constitution & Bylaws and the Liability Waiver, and POSSIBLY the
> SAC Calendar of events. All else is nice to have but not really anything
> that could be construed as official.
Considering the learning experience from the marathon waiver, anything we
hand out could be consider official.
But my major concern was that we did not have anything available at the
last meeting as to where the Flat Iron site is. What we need is some way
to be able to answer a question like: who was the last person to create a
Thunderbird Park Public Star Party hand out?
> I really think all that would be needed is a simple document control form
> that can be updated when one of these (or any other document deemed
> "official" is modified or updated. The record would include a version
> number, title, scope, owner/creator, URL & Source document location and
> revision dates. Once the owner has the webmaster post it (Pending approval
> of the membership if required), all that needs to be done is notate the date
> & revision number of the change. This does not need to be kept on anyone's
> computer, in fact it would be better if it was kept separate.
A text file would do fine. Anything not simply searchable would be too
complex and prone to be unused. A text file could be searched easily by
a browser.
-Paul
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: SUSAN PRITCHARD
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Rick Tejera
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: SUSAN PRITCHARD
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Rick Tejera