[sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: "SUSAN PRITCHARD" <svpritchard@xxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:43:11 -0700
Hi--I'm sorry, Paul--I guess that I wasn't aware of the extra secretarial
responsibilities as far as being the custodian of all offical legal
documents and records. I'm not sure that I ever received any past documents
or records in the last two years. As Treasurer, you have been great in
keeping track of payments made for the rental, insurance, speakers, etc..
As far as adding the management (electronically or otherwise) of handouts
(or other un-official documents) to the secretary, it really would have been
better to have brought this up before Jennifer agreed to take on the
position. Luckily, most of the observing sites already have been published
in the newsletter and are already on the website.
Susan
>From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
>Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 19:24:07 -0700
>
>On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 14:07:05 -0700, Paul Dickson wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose the following duty for future secretaries:
> >
> > Track and maintain all SAC handouts.
>
>Actually, SAC's constitution already says this before the entry about
>taking minutes.
>
> The Secretary will be custodian of all official documents and
> records of the organization and shall, with the President when
> properly authorized, execute all legal documents in the name of
> the organization and shall perform other duties delegated to
> her/him:
>
>I don't think directions to the observing site is too much of a stretch.
>
>
> -Paul
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Rick Tejera
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Paul Dickson
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Paul Dickson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- » [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Rick Tejera
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: New Duty for the Secretary (A Proposal)
- From: Paul Dickson