[sac-board] Re: Marathon biz

> All,
>
> I would wonder if the person who kindly donated the use of the land would
> care that someone was using the same land to sell goods. This sounds like
it
> could blossom into a large problem. I don't think the issue would be as
> greatif we were on "public" land, but I bet the forest service has rules
> against these kind of things without permits also.
>
> Marshall Dailey


Great point!  Is anyone able to give the Farnsworths a call and ask their
position?  I wonder if
they'd mind getting a little bit out of it in way of "rent" for vendors.  I
think that it'd be
a nice little "out"; that is, to ask vendors to pay rent because that's what
the landowner asks for.  (We could just
add a little on top for SAC's involvment.)

Rick and I have talked of this in the past, and we agreed that the MM has
potential to become one of the
BIG events.  But more importantly is who runs and organizes it, and I won't
fault AJ for any apsect regarding the MM.  Lord knows I wouldn't have the
energy to organize this event, much less grow it any.  However,
it doesn't mean that we couldn't do something collectively to this effect,
if it becomes our collective desire to do so.  Obviously, much discussion
needs to happen regarding this, but that can happen later.  The most
important thing right now is to establish some quick rules about vendors,
and I think a call to the Farnsworths is the absolute first thing to do.

At any rate, let's keep chatting about this, and get some ideas.  I'll start
compiling all the emails and try
to keep a list of the good/bad points.

Thad

Other related posts: