[sac-board] Re: FW: Proposed 2006 Schedule

Al, et al;

I obviously explained myself badly.  The All Arizona is generally in =
October
or late September, so I choose November for Sentinel. =20

Peter, I guess we can continue at the usual Sentinel location as long as
people decide to continue to show up.  If the number of folks drops off
because of safety concerns, then we will bring it up again at that time.

Sounds good to me, I will make up some Novice Group flyers for the =
January
meeting.

Happy Saturnalia;
Steve Coe


-----Original Message-----
From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
[mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Albert Stiewing
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 2:33 PM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: FW: Proposed 2006 Schedule

Looks good to me. Is EVAC moving All Arizona to November? This year it =
was=20
9/29-9/30.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Steve Coe" <stevecoe@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 2:24 PM
Subject: [sac-board] FW: Proposed 2006 Schedule


>I don't' know if this message got out or not, I got an error message =
after=20
>I
> sent it, so here it is again.  Sorry if folks got it twice.
> Steve Coe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Coe [mailto:stevecoe@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 9:59 PM
> To: 'Rick Tejera'; 'A.J. Crayon'; 'Al Stiewing'; 'Dave Fredericksen';=20
> 'Jack
> Jones'; 'Jenn the Pest'; 'Pesto'; 'mluttinen@xxxxxxxxx'; 'Paul =
Dickson';
> 'rhwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'rick.rotramel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'Stan =
Clark';
> 'Thad Robosson'; 'Tom Polakis'
> Subject: RE: Proposed 2006 Schedule
>
> Hello all;
>
> I have just had a chance to look over the schedule the Rick sent out =
and=20
> in
> general it looks good.  Three months to discuss:
>
> I will take Feb. 18 at Flatiron as a good night for a Novice Group =
meeting
> and prepare some flyers for the club meeting.
>
> For March, how about no planned star party except the Messier =
Marathon?
> Some years there isn't a good alternative night.
>
> Concerning the Sentinel-Schwaar Star Gaze.  If I choose November again =

> then
> the 17 and 18 th of November are really the only choices.  It does =
avoid=20
> the
> All Arizona Star Party and Thanksgiving.  Also, we can discuss the =
plusses
> and minuses of going to Sentinel.  We don't need to choose now.
>
> Give me some feed back on my choices, please.
>
> Steve Coe
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Tejera [mailto:saguaroastro@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 7:15 PM
> To: A.J. Crayon; Al Stiewing; Dave Fredericksen; Jack Jones;
> Jenn the Pest; Pesto; mluttinen@xxxxxxxxx; Paul Dickson;
> rhwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rick.rotramel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Stan Clark; =
Steve=20
> Coe;
> Thad Robosson; Tom Polakis
> Subject: Proposed 2006 Schedule
>
> All,
>
> It's that time of year when we need to start planning next
> years Schedule. IN that vain, I've drawn up a preliminary proposal. I=20
> think
> most dates are fine except for March. Following convention the regular =

> star
> party would be Mar 18th, which happens to have very early moonrise,=20
> allowing
> only 2 hours of dark sky. The following week would be the Messier=20
> Marathon,
> so moving it back a week isn't really an option. The same occurs in=20
> February
> but an earlier sunset and later moon rise give about 4 hours of =
darkness.=20
> I
> figured this would be a good date for a novice group event.
>
> Anyone have any ideas on how to handle March?
>
> Stan, if you could post this to the web discreetly and
> advise the URL so the proposed calendar can be viewed by all members, =
I'd
> appreciate it.
>
> << File: SAC Schedule 2006.pdf >>
>
> Rick Tejera
> Editor SACnews
> Saguaro Astronomy Club
> Phoenix, Arizona
> saguaroastro@xxxxxxx
> www.saguaroastro.org
>
>
>
> -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
> -- Type: application/ms-tnef
> -- File: winmail.dat
>
>
>
>=20

Other related posts: