Thad et all, I will be glad to change the e-mail links when/if they are implemented. I can have them in place within minutes of bob's setup. Stan Clark ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Thad Robosson" <starstarcracker@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:00:37 -0700 >Hey all, >Via private communication with Bob E., I have learned that it would not cost >SAC anything to set up email accounts with @saguaroastro.org. As such, I need >2 things.... > >Firstly, I'd like anyone who thinks that there are flaws with this plan to >please speak up. In a nutshell, the existing SACTreasurer account that Paul >Dickson maintains can be dropped, and the officers and chairpersons can have >their own independant "@saguaroastro.org" email addy for "official" use. >Given the price (free), I can't think of any reasons to not do this. Any >objections? > >Secondly, I'm going to wait until Tuesday to call for a vote on this so >everyong has time to speak up, at such time I'll be calling to vote a motion >to.... > >A) Have Bob E set these email addresses up...Pres, VP, Treas, Sect., Prop., >Newsletter(if he needs it.), Novice group, Public Events Cooridinator, Website >admin, Deepsky, and ATM. Do we need to add or remove some to/from this list? >Is it necessary to have each email addy listed in this motion, or can we vote >to pass this motion while keeping it open to change? > >B) Have the above emails be added to the SAC website in place of our private >email addys. This adds an element of privacy for the officers and chairs. >They will remain anonymous to the internet at large (may help cut back Spam, >strange questions, etc.), and any mail coming from/to these addresses will >more than likely be "official". As a bonus, for me anyway, it will also add a >means of organization. > >C) During officer/chair transition, passwords will be verbally "handed" over >to the incoming person by the outgoing person. > >Does anything need to be changed on this motion before vote? > >Also, Is Stan Clark officially a Chair? Is it necessary for him to be >officially "named", or does it just happen by volunteering. (Like the ATM >group?) > >Let me know, >Thad > > > >