[sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- From: gene lucas <geneluca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:19:59 -0700
I concur with most of this, and would remind that the current events
SITE is NEAR Arizona City, on the Ray Farnsworth Ranch property. We
meet there at the pleasure of Mr. Farnsworth, I believe, and probably
acknowledge that, but NOT drag him into any discussion about names.
Many years ago, the groups were (not exzactly legally) using a dis-used
property at a defunct subdivision a little closer to Arizona City
(Silverbell Acres I think is the name).
We all need some help from our friends!
Gene Lucas
(17250)
SaguaroAstro@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>Since I won't be at Friday's meeting, allow me to state my position here. As
>I had said earlier, I really think this should be a non issue, however it
>seems like it won't go away. Personally My feeling is unless EVAC can lay
>some
>legal claim to the "All Arizona" moniker, we really should not accommodate
>this request. What would be next? "Could you please find a new spot for the
>renamed Messier Marathon as we would like to have the AZ City Site associated
>with only the AASP." I see it as a bad precedent. Why should we change? They
>are the one with the problem about the name, let them come up with something
>that would identify their event with EVAC.
>
>As for previous posts regarding newsletter mentions, Paul had stated "Rick
>Tejera, the
>SACnews editor since 2000, mostly did not care what AJ called the marathon
>and let him do what he liked." This is patently not true. I certainly
>proofread all material submitted to me for accuracy and possible copyright
>infringement. I will not publish anything I can't verify nor have not been
>given
>permission (Either implicit or implied) to use. I did not "Let" AJ call it
>what he
>wanted, I just published what he gave me. As far as I knew, The AAMM was only
>name by which the event had been known. Any mention of Paul's version
>predated my tenure in the club and in fact my residency in Arizona. As AJ has
>pointed out Paul took the liberty to Decide to rename the event without AJ's
>approval, something I would not do. But that is another thread that's best
>left to
>die a quick painless death here.
>
>Anyway I've stated my position on the matter and I'll be very curious to see
>how this play's out when I return from San Diego.
>
>You know it's coming.........
>
>
>
>
>
>
>My 0.855600 Afghanistan Afghani's Worth
>
>Rick Tejera
>
>
>
>Editor SACnews
>Saguaro Astronomy Club
>Phoenix, AZ
>SaguaroAstro@xxxxxxx
>www.saguaroastro.org
>
>
>
>
>In a message dated 4/19/2005 5:51:32 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
>acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>I don't see any problem with both organizations using the term "All
>Arizona."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] All Arizona Star Party Site Credit
- From: Tom Polakis
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] Re: Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- [sac-board] All Arizona Star Party Site Credit
- From: Tom Polakis