[sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- From: Tom Polakis <tpolakis@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:14:58 -0500
Paul Dickson wrote:
This message certainly makes a good case for putting the quoted material first,
otherwise you have to read the sections backwards in order to understand what's
going on?
I sometimes do (but not this time). It's actually very appropriate to put the
"answer" first when one is trying to get the reader's attention with the
solution to a problem. Often, people with lives put lengthy e-mail messages on
the back burner. C'mon, Paul. Jenn comes up with an elegant way for SAC to
solve an EVAC problem, and you're more concerned about syntax.
If I may stoop to your level of pedantry for just a moment, the question mark
in your sentence really confused me, since it was clearly not interrogative.
Tom?
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement ENOUGH....
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- From: Paul Dickson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- » [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- [sac-board] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement ENOUGH....
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-board] Re: [EVAC] New General Assembly Meeting Place Announcement
- From: Paul Dickson