[sac-board] Re: Change to SAC H400 List
- From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:09:01 -0700
To Brian and everyone else involved in this discussion. I'd like to thank
each and everyone of you for such good feed back and support. One of the
many traits of SAC that make it an enjoyable experience to be a part.
BTW, I checked out the changes and they look good.
Clear skies,
aj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Workman, Brian (AZ76)" <brian.workman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:58 AM
Subject: [sac-board] Re: Change to SAC H400 List
AJ,
My opinion hardly matters here, but I've logged both objects:
NGC 1750 is not much of an open cluster - very ho-hum
NGC 7814 is an interesting, pretty bright, edge on galaxy
Seems like NGC 7814 is a "better" object, interest-wise, so I concur
with your recommendation. (Besides, since I've logged them both, I've
still seen all of the H400 objects.
Brian
- References:
- [sac-board] Change to SAC H400 List
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-board] Re: Change to SAC H400 List
- From: Workman, Brian (AZ76)
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Change to SAC H400 List
- » [sac-board] Re: Change to SAC H400 List
- » [sac-board] Re: Change to SAC H400 List
- [sac-board] Change to SAC H400 List
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-board] Re: Change to SAC H400 List
- From: Workman, Brian (AZ76)