[sac-board] Re: Board meeting topics....

Paul, you have done a good job encapsulating the entire discussion, much 
better than my WAG! (o;

I'd like to go on record, especially since I'm the instigator of all 
this, with my current position.  I believe we need to follow some, maybe 
not all, of Kimball's advice.  Specifically I think we need to have some 
sort of waiver available for the Messier Marathon.  Perhaps the door can 
be left open for other events that attract out of state folks.  I'm 
thinking of events like the Sentinel-Schwarr-Star-Gaze.  Right now I 
don't think we need the waivers, but who knows what will happen and what 
will be needed in the future.

Sounds pretty simple and straight forward to me.  Perhaps some 
discussion will expose some new thoughts and ideas.

Clear skies and looking forward to the Board Meeting,
aj

Paul Dickson wrote:

>On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 07:20:30 -0700, Thad Robosson wrote:
>
>  
>
>There is only one questions that needs answering at the board meeting:
>
>(1)    Does SAC want to follow the advice of its counsel?
>
>Per message #2 which AJ posted, Kimball's advice was to have releases
>signed at each event, including our monthly star party.
>
>If we choose not to follow this advice:
>
>(2)    Does SAC what to require releases for only special events like
>       the Messier Marathon?
>
>What the releases contain, is not germane to this decision, and should
>not be discussed at this meeting.
>
>If the decision is no for question (1), then this needs to be taken
>before the general assembly also.  It's important enough that the
>membership in general should vote on it.
>
>
>       -Paul
>
>
>
>
>  
>

Other related posts: