[sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- From: "SUSAN PRITCHARD" <svpritchard@xxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:09:54 -0700
Hi Al--I support your choice of staying with Chase.
On another note, as far as the Christmas Party goes on Saturday--is SAC
paying for the cost of sodas, paper products, etc ? Do I purchase these and
charge them back to SAC? --or do I provide these as my personal
contribution to the party? How was that handled last year by Dave
Fredricksen ? I called and left a message for him, but haven't heard back
yet. Anyway, thanks--Susan
>From: "Albert Stiewing" <amst@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [sac-board] Bank One is now Chase
>Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:52:16 -0700
>
>But Chase is not Bank One.
>I received notice that effective in February, but subject to fees as early
>as 1/6/06 our accounts will now be subject to fees.
>We are classified as Business checking Non Profit and will be changes to
>Chase Non Profit Business Classic Checking.
>Monthly $2.00 minimum service fee or $4.00 for photos of checks ( which we
>currently get) fee waiver for balances > $4000.
>Bank One Business Saving will be Chase Business Savings.
>No Monthly fee balance > $ 5000 Otherwise $5.00/month.
>FYI - I generally kept the checking account between $1500 & $700. The
>saving
>account between $2500 & $4100. We earned $13.03 for 11 months on our
>savings
>or $1.18/month.
>I checked with BOA there fees were higher.
>
>We could close the saving account, sign up for check safekeeping ( limiting
>our fees to $2.00) move the money to checking and avoid most fees. A quick
>review indicates that only October and November of this year would have
>been
>subject to a fee.and November would have been avoided with a timely
>deposit.
>
>The other option is to keep beating on bank doors looking for free
>checking,
>although for $15/yr ($13 lost interest & $2 bank fee for a year I don't
>know
>if it's worth the effort.
>
>Current check situation is low, but not critical, as I was waiting for the
>name change.
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- From: Paul Dickson
- References:
- [sac-board] Bank One is now Chase
- From: Albert Stiewing
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Bank One is now Chase
- » [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- » [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- » [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- » [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- » [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- » [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-board] Re: Bank One is now Chase
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Bank One is now Chase
- From: Albert Stiewing