[sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....

On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:46:23 -0700, Paul Dickson wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:54:31 -0700, Paul Dickson wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:26:07 -0500, Jennifer.T.Polakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > > I feel that it is imperative that our Constitution specifically state
> > > that we will now be  requiring waivers in order to participate in a star
> > > party.
> > 
> > I just update the constitution web page:
> >     http://members.cox.net/paul.dickson/sac.constitution.html
> > 
> > I added Article XII, but only put in the text that Kimball suggested back
> > in: http://www.freelists.org/archives/sac-board/07-2005/msg00032.html
> > This is from the middle paragraph of question 4.
> 
> After posting this message, I made a quick update to Article XII to
> define what a club event is (the first line).
> 
> Much later, after rereading Kimball's message, I added a line in
> Article VI.
> 
> So, in support of the waiver, there are changes in Articles III, VI,
> and XII.

I'm of two minds about the change in Article VI.  Before continuing, yes,
I think it should be added to the constitution.

On the one hand it should be part of the Waiver Amendment, it is
predominately the only teeth SAC has regarding waivers.  On the other
hand, including it as part of the Waiver Amendment could be consider
hiding it.  This is an important change to each member.

Do we what to split this amendment?

        -Paul

Other related posts: