[sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:44:57 -0700, Thad Robosson wrote:

> OK, I'll take a crack at this.  I think the key wording is "may" be
> expelled, but I see your concern.  It really does sound harsh.  Can
> we work in something like....  "Any SAC member who refuses to sign a
> waiver will be considered to not be participating in said club
> activity and is acting on their own behalf seperate and
> independantly from SAC."  Or am I backtracking here?

I don't like this because you are putting a statement about something
that isn't part of the club into the organization of the club.  Someone
reading the above suggested text might suppose that SAC unofficially
supports separate/independent attendees because it's common enough to
mention.


On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:44:49 -0700, AJ Crayon wrote:

> I see five amendments, not three.  What gives here?

No you don't.  You see 5 articles being change by three amendments.  The
Waiver amendment covers the changes in articles III, VI, and XIII.

        -Paul

Other related posts: