[sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- From: "Thad Robosson" <starstarcracker@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:55:53 -0700
How about this? Does this sound like a good compromise?
Thad
Quote....
Change the wording in the waiver amendment to include "Series of events"
This would give the board latitude to designate a requirement for waivers at
Sac Star parties. Also add a clause in the membership section that
essentially states "Members are required to abide by all provisions of the
C&B" or words to that effect. This puts the responsibility to comply on the
members. It would also table the debate for All star parties until later. As
we stand now, this is beginning to drag on again.
End quote.
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- From: Rick Tejera
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- » [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- From: Rick Tejera