[sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....

Again, I guess I don't get "It". As a SAC event is it SAC's prerogative to
set the requirements of said events. Again to reiterate, it is the
participants choice, not a right. Such a lawsuit as you mention would be
without any merit.  

Rick Tejera
Editor SACnews
Saguaro Astronomy Club
Phoenix, Arizona
saguaroastro@xxxxxxx
www.saguaroastro.org

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jeff Hopkins
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 2:39 PM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....

You misunderstood me. The lawsuit I am referring to is a lawsuit 
brought against SAC by someone discontent at having been rejected 
from the star party for not signing a waiver.

Jeff

At 13:04 -0700 8/23/05, <Jennifer.T.Polakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Yes I do. Especially in the case of a lawsuit we will need to produce =
>evidence that a waiver requirement for participaton is clearly stated in =
>our constitution.
>Jennifer Polakis
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jeff Hopkins
>Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:44 PM
>To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
>
>Do you honestly think deferring to the constitution would make a=20
>difference if someone did not want to sign a waiver? That is a big=20
>problem with this whole effort. You have no means of enforcing it. At=20
>best it will cause ill feelings. Enforcing it or trying to could=20
>actually be cause for a lawsuit.
>
>Jeff
-- 
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html

                     Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
                       7812 West Clayton Drive
                   Phoenix, Arizona 85033-2439 U.S.A.
                                www.hposoft.com

Other related posts: