We should keep the amendment stating who would be resposible for = administering waivers--it's fine really for what it does. Maybe to go back to adding an Article 12 (I thought this was one of the = things AJ's committee was working on). I think Al's initial proposal is a good start: Should SAC's board of directors deem it necessary, it can create and=20 maintain a release for events or a series of events. The release shall=20 include a warning of the inherent risks associated with observing from = a=20 dark, remote, primitive site, accessed on unimproved roads. Event rules = and=20 etiquette shall also be supplied as an attachment and receipt = acknowledged=20 on the release.=20 -----Original Message----- From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Thad Robosson Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 1:53 PM To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution.... >A SAC sponsored event would be subject to a SAC constitution. > > > But. . . > In the highly unlikely event of a lawsuit, SAC will be in a much = better =3D > defense to be able to clearly prove that this rule was made known to = the =3D > person and they chose not to abide by it. =3D20 > > Jennifer Jennifer, Is there a particular wording that you had in mind for this article of = the=20 constitution? Thad