[rsc] Re: Clarification around Trainer/Workgroup Member

Melanie,

I believe that WorkGroup members, in all of ROOTS workgroups, are self-selected 
volunteers.  There is no vetting process for a WorkGroup member, as far as I 
know.  The vetting process is something C/APP/RSC WorkGroup uses to authorize 
people who declare their interest in being recognized as RSC Trainers.  Anyone 
may submit a declaration of interest in being a Trainer.  We are working on the 
process of and criteria for authorization of those who declare an interest.

WorkGroup members do not have to be trainers, nor do they have to declare their 
interest in being trainers.  Not all trainers are on the C/APP/RSC WorkGroup, 
only those who volunteer.  Some currently authorized trainers like being on the 
WorkGroup listserv so that they know what is going on but they do not volunteer 
or are not able to serve actively on the WorkGroup.

That's how I understand things as they are right now.

Best.

Bob


On Aug 20, 2010, at 12:21 AM, Melanie St. Ours wrote:

> Friends,
> 
> Can someone clarify this for me?
> 
> In reading Kathie's summary of notes, it appears as if declarations from new 
> recruits will be declarations to become an RSC trainer. Is it not possible to 
> be a workgroup member without being a fully vetted trainer?
> 
> If so, do potential workgroup members also need to make a declaration as we 
> have done in the past?
> 
> I have been in dialogue with Adam Williams about his interest in joining the 
> workgroup. Should I refer him to Shon so that he can be part of the cohort 
> that receives the email after our conversation at the retreat?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Melanie

Other related posts: