[rollei_list] Re: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Voigtländer Avus
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:53:25 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc James Small" <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 8:27 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Voigtländer Avus
On 6/18/2009 10:35 AM, J Patric Dahlén wrote:
Pan- and orthopan films must be handled in complete
darkness, but
ortho films (like Efke 25 ORT or Ilford Ortho Plus) can
be handled in
dark red light.
Well, no. A dim green safelight will work well with pan
films -- back
in the dieing days of darkrooms, some folks were selling
LED lights in
that range. Ortho films can tolerate a brighter reddish
light.
Hollywood still portrays photographers, even digital
dudes, mucking
about in an orange-lit darkroom. Go figure!
Marc
See Kodak's instructions for pan films. The reason that
a green light is used is two fold: The dark adapted eye is
most sensitive to green and many, especially older, pan
films have a dip in sensitivity around green. Kodak
recommends the following: "A Kodak Safelight Filter, Wratten
Series 3 (dark green) in a suitable safelight lamp with a 15
Watt bulb can be used for a few seconds _only_, at 4 feet,
after development is half completed."
The partial development desensitizes the film to some
degree.
Dark red safelights are reasonably safe for
orthochromatic materials. The term "orthopanchromatic" is
somewhat obscure but I think it was used for ortho materials
with extended green sensitivity, a dark red safelight is
probably safe for them but the individual data sheets should
be consulted.
Some modern printing papers of the variable contrast
type have enough sensitivity in the green region to require
a red safelight although the usual amber Kodak OC lamp will
work with most. The OC has higher visual brightness than a
red lamp of the same measured brightness so it may have an
advantage for certain materials. Its also more pleasant to
work under. Non color sensitized materials can be worked
with under amber or red lights but some slow materials can
also be safe with a yellow light.
I feel the same way Marc does about the way
photographic darkrooms are shown in the movies. My other
bugaboo, being an inveterate reader of detective stories, is
the number which assume that photographers have an unlimited
supply of cyanide in their darkrooms all ready to poison
people with. While there are cyanide compounds, like
potassium ferrocyanide, used as bleach its not a very good
poison and true cyanide is very rarely used in general
photography. Newspaper plants did have it, for making
half-tone plates by the old method which is essentially the
wet plate process. Cyanide is a component of Monckhoevn's
Intensifier, which also contains mecuric chloride, another
rather nasty poison. This solution was used to clean up dots
since it has the peculiar property of being an intensifier
for dense parts of the image but a reducer for low density
parts. The old method of half-toning has not been in general
use since perhaps the 1940s.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts: