[rollei_list] Re: rollei_list Digest V3 #97
- From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:13:17 -0700
No, I adapted them.
I looked at adapting them to rotate but that would be a LOT of work
and, frankly, not worth the effort. The problem with the Rollei prism
is that it does not focus, and it doesn't contain a meter. Hassy
meter prisms have a center weighted integrated meter, a spot meter,
and an incident meter. The meter is very useful for determining
bellows extension and filter factors. My SL66 has built-in bellows
extension factors for the 80, 120, and 150, as well as the reversed
80, but I sometimes use my 250 or 50, and a filter, with a lot of
bellows extension and even though I use my hand held meter for
exposure determination, I sometimes check the factor via the prism
meter. It's there, so why not use it?
I don't use the prism meter very often but there are circumstances
where it has come in very handy. One time was when I left my 'real'
meter (Minolta VI - which is a magnificent all around spot/incident
meter) in another backpack, in my car, and I ended up too far from
the car to go back just for my meter, so I used the Hasselblad meter
prism for everything (I was way upstream, in the CA coastal
redwoods). I was not disappointed with the results. I shoot 75%-90%
Velvia and exposure is critical. These Hasselblad prism meters
actually do a good job.
Speaking of meters, I used to carry two meters, my Pentax Digital
spotmeter and my Sekonic Studio Deluxe incident meter. The Minolta VI
has taken over both with a very high degree of accuracy and a
plethora of useful features. Out in the field under the CA sun, a
meter really is rarely needed. But I do a major part of my
photography under redwood a forest canopy, coastal fog & drizzle, and
a dozen other very variable light situations. I've owned and used
most every meter version, and I have to say that I like my Minolta VI
best... so far... :-)
The MAIN reason for the Hasselblad metered finders is that they are
clear, clean, and sharp (FOCUSABLE).
BTW, adapting the Hasselblad prism finder to the SL66 does NOT in any
way modify the Hasselblad prism finder. It can be removed from the
SL66 mount and used directly on a Hasselblad. No one would ever know
that it spent time on an SL66.
I do not have a 500 Tele-Tessar. But I do have a 250 HFT and a 2x extender.
Jim
At 11:10 AM 4/17/2007 -0400, Jan Decher wrote:
Jim:
Your Hassy finder adaptation is very interesting, especially for
shooting chromes. How did you do it? Did you have it done by Harry
or S.K. Grimes?
I especially like the PME45. Does it rotate like the meterless SL66
prism finder?
Do you have the 5.6/500 TeleTessar?
Jan
On 17 Apr 2007, at 02:29, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:09:05 -0700
From: Jim Brick <<mailto:jim@xxxxxxxxx>jim@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [rollei_list] My switch to the SL66
...
One thing I did early on was to adapt both the=20
Hasselblad PME45 and the PME90 finders to an SL66=20
mount. This gives me through the lens metering=20
for those occasions when TTL metering is=20
advantageous. I did the same for my student - she=20
now has a Hasselblad PME45 on her SL66. One of=20
the reasons for moving to the Hasselblad metered=20
finders is that they both have built-in=20
adjustable diopters. ...
Hassy finders on my SL66's:
<http://www.visualimpressions.com/HassyFindersSL66.jpg>http://www.visualimpressions.com/HassyFindersSL66.jpg
Jim
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: rollei_list Digest V3 #97
- From: Jan Decher
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: rollei_list Digest V3 #97
- » [rollei_list] Re: rollei_list Digest V3 #97
Jim:Your Hassy finder adaptation is very interesting, especially for shooting chromes. How did you do it? Did you have it done by Harry or S.K. Grimes? I especially like the PME45. Does it rotate like the meterless SL66 prism finder?
Do you have the 5.6/500 TeleTessar? Jan On 17 Apr 2007, at 02:29, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:09:05 -0700 From: Jim Brick <<mailto:jim@xxxxxxxxx>jim@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [rollei_list] My switch to the SL66 ... One thing I did early on was to adapt both the=20 Hasselblad PME45 and the PME90 finders to an SL66=20 mount. This gives me through the lens metering=20 for those occasions when TTL metering is=20 advantageous. I did the same for my student - she=20 now has a Hasselblad PME45 on her SL66. One of=20 the reasons for moving to the Hasselblad metered=20 finders is that they both have built-in=20 adjustable diopters. ... Hassy finders on my SL66's: <http://www.visualimpressions.com/HassyFindersSL66.jpg>http://www.visualimpressions.com/HassyFindersSL66.jpg Jim
- [rollei_list] Re: rollei_list Digest V3 #97
- From: Jan Decher