[rollei_list] reliability of SL66* electronics
- From: Christoph Hammann <chammann@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:40:16 +0200
Am 29.04.2008 um 05:10 schrieb Micha:
AND IS SOMEONE GOING TO ACTUALLY SHARE INFORMATION ABOUT ROLLEIS ON
THE
FREAKING ROLLIE LIST.
Micha Rice
Glad to do so, Micha. And, by the way, don't feed the trolls.
It behooves me as a newbie on the list to introduce myself: I'm a 44
year old photographer from Germany working predominantly in black &
white. I prefer to use film in 135, 120 and 4x5 sizes to get my
pictures: landscapes, nature details, concept, street scenes and
environmental portraits. A taste of the results can be had at my
photoblog: http://www.cch-photography.com/3.html . Comments in any
language but foul are always appreciated.
Getting on to the Rollei content: Till now I've been using a
Hasselblad for medium format, but the other day I had occasion to try
out a Rolleiflex SL66 (first version) and was instantly hooked. The
Scheimpflug principle embodied in a camera hand-holdable! That'd be
magic for my nature detail scenes wherein I like to use anti-
Scheimpflug movements to minimise the depth of field and play with one
of the few means of creative expression that are unique to photography
and not inherited from painting: sharp-unsharp-transition and "bokeh".
Anyway, a week of reading about this camera line followed, combined
with obsessive 'baywatching. Was sniped in the last minute for a
pristine SL66-SE.
In my reading, I chanced upon various comments on the unreliability of
the metering models' electronics and the difficulties of getting them
repaired.
How's that in your experience? Would you prefer an original SL66 or a
metering model on the used market?
Mind you, I'm not opposed to using my spot meter, but I like to use my
medium format camera in a fast, intuitive way, having the spot meter
build into the camera would be one gadget less to think about in the
situation.
Best regards, Christoph Hammann
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] FREE Tri-X
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Michael Eric Berube
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Jim Brick
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Michael Eric Berube
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: ERoustom
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Michael Eric Berube
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE
- From: Micha
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] reliability of SL66* electronics
- » [rollei_list] Re: reliability of SL66* electronics
FREAKING ROLLIE LIST. Micha Rice
- [rollei_list] FREE Tri-X
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Michael Eric Berube
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Jim Brick
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Michael Eric Berube
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: ERoustom
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Michael Eric Berube
- [rollei_list] Re: FREE Tri-X
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE
- From: Micha