All that technology does not mean a high end digital camera produces a better image than a high end film mechanical camera, this is one of the main points to me, these digital cameras are a very expensive sophism, except if you use them as a professional photographer linked to photojournalism or some other area requiring images massive production.- Carlos 2009/11/6 FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Carlos, > the digital cameras I use are a Canon EOS 1Ds mk2, a Canon EOS 5d, a Nikon > D3x, a Nikon D300, a Nikon D700, a Leica M8.2, a Leica M9 and a Panasonic > GH1. They are all VERY similar to the 35mm film cameras I use but instead of > a simple winding mechanism and a space to put film they have a great deal of > high tech electronics and astonishing technology sensor. They all have a > shutter and focussing system similar to or better than their film equivalents. > Certainly your description would be not all that inaccurate for camera phones > and some P&S digitals, bt that is completely out of this context since we are > talking about quality cameras, not instamatics. > I find the difference between my Leica M6 and M9 to use is small, and I can > easily see why it is much more expensive to make, and hence to buy. > cheers, > Frank > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx> > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, 6 November, 2009 17:24:48 > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: new Zeiss Ikon- a hollow construct? > > Frank, there is a very large difference between a digital camera body > and a high quality mechanical camera body, the digital camera is a > group of electric circuits made by machines, the high quality > mechanical camera is direct human work, it requires craftmanship, the > mechanical camera has something that the digital camera never had, has > or will have, a human heart. > BTW, a very fine mechanical camera like the Zeiss Ikon RF that you > could use for 1000 years costs about U$S 950 at B&H NYC, the true > scandal is the high end digital cameras price.- > > Carlos > > > 2009/11/6 FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi Jan, >> All of the high quality large sensor digital cameras are very expensive. >> Here in England the Leica M9 is less expensive than some and more than >> others. In this context not out of step with their competition, if too >> expensive for most customers. The we would all like to have less expensive >> quality but the reality is that it is not available yet. >> Really the least expensive top quality item, the Sony, is probably a loss >> leader to get market share. >> What is economic reality is the cost of these high end items by Hasselblad, >> phase one, Canon, Nikon, Leica et al. Most people can not afford to use >> equipment at this level. >> What is probably a scandal is the price of film cameras. They have so little >> in them either technology or componentry. I bet the ZI rangefinder has a >> -much- bigger profit margin than the Leica M8 or M9. >> All digital equipment has huge depreciation, be it computers, home theater >> or cameras. This is really only a problem if you were investing, or have to >> have the very latest thing. My daughter has my old 6 or 7 megapixel Canon >> dSLR and gets great results, despite it being worth little to sell. Would >> she get better results on prints A4 from the latest 7D? The fact is, not >> much. >> Frank Dernie >> >> <This is what's happening with the current Leica S2 and M9 gear. The prices >> are completely out of step with economic realities. Right now on the Leica >> Users Group, there is so much ridiculous reasoning to justify buying the >> $7000 M9 body hat I had to turn the digest off. This, after everybody just >> got over buying the already overpriced M8 - now worth less than half its >> new price!> >> > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list