[rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:47:08 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter J Nebergall" <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 1:40 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] another odd question RE; Rolleicord
I've had a number of people comment on my old Rolleicord
V. Some tell me
the Cords were "not built to the same standards as the
concurrent
Flexes." and suggest that it's xenar 3.5 is not as sharp
as the xenars
on some Flexes....
I know the Cord was cheaper -- but was it made to lower
quality control
standards?
Peter Nebergall
---
Rollei List
This is rubbish! I have a Rolleicord IV and have worked
on it and a few others. I have have three Rolleiflexs, one
of which has a Xenar in it. The quality of construction is
the same and the quality of the lenses is the same.
Actually, I think the Xenar in my cord is the better of the
two. The lower cost of the cord is because it is a much
simpler camera. It does not have the automatic threading
feature or the complex film winding mechanism with coupled
shutter cocking and has a simpler finder hood without the
eye level mirror arrangement. Schneider sold its lenses
cheaper than Zeiss but its pretty obvious that the quality
of post war Schneider lenses is excellent. The shutter used
in the two is identical. Even though the Cord was cheaper
than the Flex it was still a deluxe camera. It seems to me
that F&H had a single quality standard which it applied to
all products.
BTW, my original Rolleicord IV, bought new, came in a
wonderful gold and red foil covered box. I still remember
the leather odor it had when opened. I kept that box for
many years but it got lost in some move or other.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- From: Jerry Lehrer
- References:
- [rollei_list] another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- From: Peter J Nebergall
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- » [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
the Cords were "not built to the same standards as the concurrent
Flexes." and suggest that it's xenar 3.5 is not as sharp as the xenars
on some Flexes....
I know the Cord was cheaper -- but was it made to lower quality control
standards?
Peter Nebergall --- Rollei List
--- Rollei List
- [rollei_list] Re: another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- From: Jerry Lehrer
- [rollei_list] another odd question RE; Rolleicord
- From: Peter J Nebergall