[rollei_list] Re: Zeiss SLRs

Thank you for your reply, Marvin. This is really such a limited use of the ZS 
that I would not label it such... YMMV.

Regarding the lenses on the E versus the F (or the C or D for that matter), 
they are the same... the differences you experience will be the result of 
individual variation and the state of tune for that particular camera.



Eric Goldstein

-----Original Message-----
From: Marvin Wallace <Marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: May 26, 2005 6:10 PM
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Zeiss SLRs

As I am in Hong Kong I miss the bulk of conversation through being in a
different time zone.
In response to a question of how one uses the zone system with 35 mm camera
format; the answer is once you hve made your adjustments for you exposure
you then need to develop the whole role of film at +,- or normal
development. This works out well if the exposure is the same across the
whole film. If not you just have to make a note of your most important shots
and develop accordingly. The other alternative is to shoot in similar
lighting conditions i.e all at night;this would be the desired solution if
economy is important.

Would you advise upgrading from the 3.5 E? and to which model?
Is the 3.5 E planar prone to flare? 

-----Original Message-----
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter K.
Sent: 27 May 2005 06:02
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Zeiss SLRs

ContaFLEX. Not ContaREX

On 5/26/05, Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 1:47 PM
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT - Bokken
>=20
>=20
> > And hence the reason for no F2 in a CF lens since you are
> > limited by
> > leaf shutter. One reason Zeiss lost out in the SLR market
> > in the 70s
> > if you remember. Thay had great lense but they were very
> > slow next to
> > the Nikons and other because they all had leaf shutters in
> > them.
> >
> > Peter K
> >
>  Doesn't the Contarex have a focal plane shutter?
>=20
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> ---
> Rollei List
>=20
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>=20
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>=20
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>=20
>=20


--=20
Peter K
=D3=BF=D5=AC
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: