[rollei_list] Re: Xenar sharpness, was OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: Allen Zak <azak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 23:19:35 -0400
Once I had a Rolleicord V with a superb Xenar that, in a bout of
stupidity, I sold. Then I acquired a 'cord III with a Xenar that was
depressingly flat. But I now own a Rolleiflex MX-EVS Xenar that is
breathtakingly sharp ( I've never been much of a bokeh sniffer).
Maybe it's less a matter of ergonomics than luck of the draw.
Allen Zak
On May 20, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Aaron Reece wrote:
I have a Rolleicord III with Xenar that takes photos that are
frighteningly sharp. It easily bests my 'flex MX with Tessar and even
gives my Xenotar a run for its money at f/8 and above. Part of this
may be due to the ergonomics of the shutter release on the Cord, which
seems more conducive to minimizing camera shake. Somehow the release
on the 'flexes seems to encourage shake if I am not really
concentrating on avoiding movement.
The problem with my Xenar, and one of the reasons I don't use it too
much anymore, is that the bokeh tends to get really ugly towards the
edges of the image. It can be very distracting in a typical portrait
with shallow depth of field, for example. Many others have reported
this drawback here and in other fora.
Still, in situations where shallow depth of field is not desirable, it
is a great lens and well worth adding to one's arsenal.
Best regards,
Aaron Reece
On May 20, 2007, at 1:33 PM, dpurdy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Though I have got to say that
looking at people's work on line it is amazing how often the
Rolleicord
Xenar images look exceedingly sharp.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'in
the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: Xenar sharpness, was OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: Eric Goldstein
- References:
- [rollei_list] OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: eroustom
- [rollei_list] Re: OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: dpurdy
- [rollei_list] Re: OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: Aaron Reece
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: Xenar sharpness, was OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- » [rollei_list] Re: Xenar sharpness, was OT? Lens Film Compatibility
The problem with my Xenar, and one of the reasons I don't use it too much anymore, is that the bokeh tends to get really ugly towards the edges of the image. It can be very distracting in a typical portrait with shallow depth of field, for example. Many others have reported this drawback here and in other fora.
Still, in situations where shallow depth of field is not desirable, it is a great lens and well worth adding to one's arsenal.
Best regards, Aaron Reece On May 20, 2007, at 1:33 PM, dpurdy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Though I have got to say thatlooking at people's work on line it is amazing how often the RolleicordXenar images look exceedingly sharp.
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- [rollei_list] Re: Xenar sharpness, was OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: eroustom
- [rollei_list] Re: OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: dpurdy
- [rollei_list] Re: OT? Lens Film Compatibility
- From: Aaron Reece