[rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:24:26 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 5:38 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
Does any one have experience with the legendry
Voigtlander
Apo Lanthar?
Does any one know why they reach such high prices.
Regards,
Marvin.
P.S. SMILE PHOTOGRAPHY IS FUN!
Here is some discussion and references:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00D4XG
http://yandr.50megs.com/vt/lenses/pro.htm
Eric Goldstein
The first is a catalogue showing construction. It is
interesting that the Universal Heliar, a soft focus lens for
portraiture, uses Hans Hartings original Heliar
construction, i.e., with the negative elements facing
outwards. Kingslake states that this lens had excessive
coma, field curvature, and astigmatism. Hartings second
version reversed the order of power and put the positive
elements of the cemented doublets facing outward, this was a
better lens but still not a very good one. The second design
was called the Dynar. Later Voigtlander changed this to
Heliar because they liked the name better. Despite Harting's
lack of success the design is capable of producing excellent
lenses. Later Voigtlander designs followed the generic type
but not Harting's design.
Voigtlander does not actually state that the Apo Lanthar
is apochromatic, it probably isn't, but still could have
very low chromatic aberration. The Heilar type is inherently
symmetrical so it has low lateral color.
I attributed the Kodak series to George Aklin, bad
memory, it was Fred Altman, the patent is USP 2,279,384. The
Pentac, designed by Lional Booth is USP 1,421,156
Harting's original patent is USP 716,035, the Dynar is USP
765,006 A later Heliar, designed by Albrecht Tronnier is
USP 2,645,154 and another issued at about the same time is
USP 2,645,156.
Zeiss patents from the mid 1950's include a couple of
Heliar types, USP 2,764,062 Gunther Lange is an example.
BTW, Tronnier also designed a five element Planar/Xenotar
type described in USP 2,670,659 I have no idea if this was
ever produced or, if so, in what camera or cameras it might
have been used.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- From: Eric Goldstein
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- » [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
Does any one have experience with the legendry Voigtlander
Apo Lanthar?
Does any one know why they reach such high prices.
Regards, Marvin. P.S. SMILE PHOTOGRAPHY IS FUN!
Here is some discussion and references:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00D4XG
http://yandr.50megs.com/vt/lenses/pro.htm
Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: VoigtlanderApo Lanthar
- From: Eric Goldstein