[rollei_list] VERY OT: British Traditions on Royalty and Peerage
- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:41:44 -0400
At 07:09 PM 7/29/2009, Jim Boy wrote:
Why would she be considered a commoner once she got the top
job? I'd think you'd be about as royal as you could get.
David Chananie
Under the UK system you are a Royal or a Peer or a Commoner. The
spouse of one of those does not rise automatically to share the
status of their mate. Prince Phillip is a prince because he was a
Greek Prince, and that is a title of courtesy in the UK, recognized
only in 1950. He is also the Duke of Edinburgh as he was created as
such: that makes him a peer of the realm. But he is not a Royal
through his marriage to Queen Elizabeth. He is a Royal as he is a
potential heir to the crowns of the UK and Denmark and Russia and
Greece and possibly others. So, if you meet him, you address him as
"Your Royal Highness". USians do not bow or do more than nod the
head, though that has been accepted since the time of Charles Adams
at the Court of St James in the 1800's.
Elizabeth Bowles-Lyon, George VI's wife and mother to the current
Queen, was very much a commoner with strong ties to the peerage. She
was born a commoner, lived as a commoner, though called, "Your Royal
Majesty", and died a commoner, and glad for her status from all I
have heard. Her Ma-in-Law was a Royal, incidentally.
The younger son of the Duke of Marlborough married an American
heiress. Her husband was "Lord Randolph Churchill" and she was "Lady
Jenny Churchill", the use of the first names with the titles
indicating that they were commoners, as Lord Randolph's brother
inherited the title. (The dowager Duchess of Marlborough, on her
deathbed, told the assembled multitude, "do not let that horrid
Winston inherit the title!")
Winston Churchill was their child, and he was always a commoner, only
agreeing to being granted a Garter when he retired from
government. Knights in the UK are commoners..
These rules are complex but really do follow a simple system when you
contemplate it as a system. If you want confusion, look to the
situation in, say, France or Italy, or even worse, Russia, where the
Tsar had to establish colleges of peers in every oblast to keep
things straight.
Marc
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] VERY OT: British Traditions on Royalty and Peerage - Marc James Small