[rollei_list] Use of Rolleikins

  • From: "Jerry Laderberg" <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:08:00 -0500

Well I tried a Rolleikin on my first Rollei ( 2.8C) back in 1971. I found it to be less than user friendly and never mounted another. The 80mm lens' perspective was nice , though. I have a box of accumulated Rolleikin parts around here if anyone needs some ( next Friday, of course).




----- Original Message ----- From: "Elias Roustom" <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:44 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: 135 vs. 135


Slow, cumbersome, marvelous, fun, whatever...

> I think it should be a requirement that everyone on the Rollei User
Group use the Rolleikin at least once.  :  )

Elias

On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Marvin wrote:

Elias, isn’t the Rolleikin a slow cumbersome device for 35mm.
Marvin.

-----Original Message-----
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elias Roustom
Sent: 17 November 2009 13:04
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: 135 vs. 135

So all the 135 bashing by MF aficionados is just about un-cropped
negative size to enlargement ratio? I know, I know, that's nearly
everything...

Well I still like the 24x36 area I get out of my TLRs, and the
Rolleikin is one hell of a gadget.

Elias

On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:46 PM, Marc James Small wrote:

At 11:37 PM 11/16/2009, Elias Roustom wrote:
a greater data-catch on a Rolleiflex TLR than you do on, say, a
Rolleiflex SL35E.

Because the negative size compensates for it?
So it follows that the center 24x36 area of a TLR 6x6 negative is  not
necessarily sharper, or more data rich, than a 24x36 area from a
micro
format SLR?

Specific lenses vary but, in general, I believe that, no, the
central area of a MF lens is still less capable of resolution than
is a lens designed for miniature-format work.

Marc


msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into  www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into  www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list




---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: