[rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:21:21 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Williams" <dwilli10@xxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:39 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
Interesting.
I used to work for a company that had an apartment in
Crystal City,
just down the road from the Pentagon.*
Somewhere in one of the connected buildings, (maybe even
the basement
of the Crystal City complex) was some portion of the
Patent Office,
forgot just what they did. I walked in, looked around and
walked out
since I didn't have anything to look for. Also, I find
that reading
patents is a very boring process. Every succeeding claim
includes
the prior claim, all in detail. They muck up the drawings
so that
you can't even recognize your own patents.
I would guess that being a patent attorney would be a well
paying,
stress-free line of business, but I think it would be very
boring.
DAW
*With regard to the Pentagon, I was once able to write a
trip report
which concluded: "The last person we saw was the secretary
of
defense". Of course the truth is that we saw his back and
he never saw us.
Some patents are interesting others are intended to
obscure stuff, mainly that the patentee doesn't have much to
patent. I've been researching the history of sound recording
and certain areas of electronics for a long time now and
find that patents are often very necessary reading.
Dr. John Frayne, who was a pioneer researcher for Bell
Labs and an old friend, once told me that when they did the
patent search for the new Western Electric 3D stereo
recorder they discovered that much of the work had already
been done and patented by Bell Labs in the early and mid
1930's. The labs were making experimental stereo disc
recordings in about 1935. Many of these survive and have
been released as Lps or CDs. The ones I've heard are quite
remarkable. Of course, the labs were not aware in the 1930's
that they were re-inventing much of a process explored by
Alan Blumlein of EMI. Blumlein was making 45-45 discs while
Bell Labs were doing vertical-lateral and also using
intensity microphone technique. Some of Blumlein's
recordings also survive and are astonishing. All this stuff
is hidden in obscure patents. Bell Labs might have some
excuse for not being aware of the EMI work but all of the
original stereo work was published in the Bell Labs Journal
including a special issue dedicated to it. Bell Labs was
doing three channel high-fidelity photographic recording in
the late 1930's. These machines were capable of flat
response in excess of 30 to 15,000 hz with very low
distortion and noise level about 60db below the saturation
point. They were also using elementary "companders" to
improve signal to noise ratio, these were a kind of early
Dolby unit.
Google patents allows text searching of _all_ US
patents regardless of date. It has proved to be an extremely
valuable research tool.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: Marc James Small
- References:
- [rollei_list] US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: Don Williams
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] US Patent and Trademark Office
- » [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- » [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- » [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- » [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
Interesting.I used to work for a company that had an apartment in Crystal City,
just down the road from the Pentagon.*Somewhere in one of the connected buildings, (maybe even the basement of the Crystal City complex) was some portion of the Patent Office, forgot just what they did. I walked in, looked around and walked out since I didn't have anything to look for. Also, I find that reading patents is a very boring process. Every succeeding claim includes the prior claim, all in detail. They muck up the drawings so that
you can't even recognize your own patents.I would guess that being a patent attorney would be a well paying, stress-free line of business, but I think it would be very boring.
DAW*With regard to the Pentagon, I was once able to write a trip report which concluded: "The last person we saw was the secretary of defense". Of course the truth is that we saw his back and he never saw us.
- [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: US Patent and Trademark Office
- From: Don Williams